<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Angels of security</title>
	<atom:link href="http://angelsofsecurity.com/blog/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://angelsofsecurity.com/blog</link>
	<description>Musings of an infosec renegade</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 19 Jul 2011 19:43:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Read what your CEO reads by chort</title>
		<link>http://angelsofsecurity.com/blog/2011/07/17/read-what-your-ceo-reads/comment-page-1/#comment-12465</link>
		<dc:creator>chort</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jul 2011 19:43:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://angelsofsecurity.com/blog/?p=733#comment-12465</guid>
		<description>Why not be part of the solution?  Leave a comment on that website article with some better suggestions.  Write an email to the author educating them on better advice to give an executive seeking to avoid breaches.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why not be part of the solution?  Leave a comment on that website article with some better suggestions.  Write an email to the author educating them on better advice to give an executive seeking to avoid breaches.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on stop patching by Ty</title>
		<link>http://angelsofsecurity.com/blog/2011/03/01/stop-patching/comment-page-1/#comment-12288</link>
		<dc:creator>Ty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Mar 2011 17:46:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://angelsofsecurity.com/blog/?p=725#comment-12288</guid>
		<description>Good point. I concur.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good point. I concur.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on IPV6 + MAC addresses + Geolocation = Privacy fail by Angel One</title>
		<link>http://angelsofsecurity.com/blog/2010/10/29/ipv6-mac-addresses-geolocation-privacy-fail/comment-page-1/#comment-12287</link>
		<dc:creator>Angel One</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Feb 2011 21:21:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://angelsofsecurity.com/blog/?p=683#comment-12287</guid>
		<description>Google is not collecting MAC addresses of machines (at least as far as i know) - just routers. Whether that MAC address will be part of the IPV6 Address will all depend on if and how the vendors implement autoconfig for home routers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google is not collecting MAC addresses of machines (at least as far as i know) &#8211; just routers. Whether that MAC address will be part of the IPV6 Address will all depend on if and how the vendors implement autoconfig for home routers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on IPV6 + MAC addresses + Geolocation = Privacy fail by Arjan</title>
		<link>http://angelsofsecurity.com/blog/2010/10/29/ipv6-mac-addresses-geolocation-privacy-fail/comment-page-1/#comment-12286</link>
		<dc:creator>Arjan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Feb 2011 19:46:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://angelsofsecurity.com/blog/?p=683#comment-12286</guid>
		<description>Are you sure Google collected MAC addresses of computers as well? That would not make a lot of sense: I take it on the road. Surely, Google (also) harvested MAC addresses of wireless access points. But such MAC addresses are NOT in an IPv6 address (while indeed the MAC address of a computer might be).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Are you sure Google collected MAC addresses of computers as well? That would not make a lot of sense: I take it on the road. Surely, Google (also) harvested MAC addresses of wireless access points. But such MAC addresses are NOT in an IPv6 address (while indeed the MAC address of a computer might be).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on constellation energy called out in book by admin</title>
		<link>http://angelsofsecurity.com/blog/2011/01/07/constellation-energy-called-out-in-book/comment-page-1/#comment-12284</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Jan 2011 04:17:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://angelsofsecurity.com/blog/?p=718#comment-12284</guid>
		<description>@Anonymous Looks like it was. And quickly too - I posted on Friday at 2, cleaned up by Monday at 8:30. (My sympathies go out to whatever engineer had to work through the weekend).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Anonymous Looks like it was. And quickly too &#8211; I posted on Friday at 2, cleaned up by Monday at 8:30. (My sympathies go out to whatever engineer had to work through the weekend).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on constellation energy called out in book by Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://angelsofsecurity.com/blog/2011/01/07/constellation-energy-called-out-in-book/comment-page-1/#comment-12283</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Jan 2011 13:38:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://angelsofsecurity.com/blog/?p=718#comment-12283</guid>
		<description>The link does not appear to exist. Guess the message was received.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The link does not appear to exist. Guess the message was received.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Spaming to find goods launderers by Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://angelsofsecurity.com/blog/2010/09/14/spaming-to-find-goods-launderers/comment-page-1/#comment-11960</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Dec 2010 15:50:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://angelsofsecurity.com/blog/?p=643#comment-11960</guid>
		<description>Sandy, I have recived teh same emal from Wolfgang Risop. Have you finished your legitimacy check? What did you find out? Please, any additional information. It seems to me very suspesious. 
Thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sandy, I have recived teh same emal from Wolfgang Risop. Have you finished your legitimacy check? What did you find out? Please, any additional information. It seems to me very suspesious.<br />
Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Seen at OWASP appsec  dc by Mark</title>
		<link>http://angelsofsecurity.com/blog/2010/11/08/seen-at-owasp-appsec-dc/comment-page-1/#comment-10978</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Nov 2010 21:57:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://angelsofsecurity.com/blog/2010/11/08/seen-at-owasp-appsec-dc/#comment-10978</guid>
		<description>You can thank Doug.  It was his idea :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You can thank Doug.  It was his idea :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on IPV6 + MAC addresses + Geolocation = Privacy fail by Reuven</title>
		<link>http://angelsofsecurity.com/blog/2010/10/29/ipv6-mac-addresses-geolocation-privacy-fail/comment-page-1/#comment-10866</link>
		<dc:creator>Reuven</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Nov 2010 03:40:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://angelsofsecurity.com/blog/?p=683#comment-10866</guid>
		<description>Not necessarily- While I don&#039;t have an example handy, I believe I&#039;ve seen some routers where the internal and external MAC addresses differ by 1. I suspect it depends on the make and software of the router.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not necessarily- While I don&#8217;t have an example handy, I believe I&#8217;ve seen some routers where the internal and external MAC addresses differ by 1. I suspect it depends on the make and software of the router.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on IPV6 + MAC addresses + Geolocation = Privacy fail by Angel One</title>
		<link>http://angelsofsecurity.com/blog/2010/10/29/ipv6-mac-addresses-geolocation-privacy-fail/comment-page-1/#comment-10697</link>
		<dc:creator>Angel One</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Nov 2010 13:03:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://angelsofsecurity.com/blog/?p=683#comment-10697</guid>
		<description>Ack - I actually just realized an even bigger flaw. When running a traceroute you&#039;ll get the outside interface of the router. The wireless AP will be running on the inside interface. 

OTOH, if the outside interface is using autocnofig (possible in home routers), you should be able to tell easily from the IP address what brand it is.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ack &#8211; I actually just realized an even bigger flaw. When running a traceroute you&#8217;ll get the outside interface of the router. The wireless AP will be running on the inside interface. </p>
<p>OTOH, if the outside interface is using autocnofig (possible in home routers), you should be able to tell easily from the IP address what brand it is.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

